Over the past couple of years one refrain has been near constant, “we’re not seeing audiences coming back as we’d hoped”.

This has led to increasingly gloomy findings and headlines:

And graphics like this:

Audience / Visitors Numbers pre covid
Source: Advisory Board for the Arts

Whilst the pandemic is often the thing people point a finger at, the seeds of these issues were sown long before.

In a piece (linked above) where he interviews 72 regional theater leaders, the New York Times’ Michael Paulson writes “The pandemic was an accelerant […] But the issues at the heart of this crisis — the aging of the audience, the growing role of streaming media in people’s entertainment diets, the decline in subscriptions as the way consumers plan their theatergoing — were underway before it.”

But audiences are still spending considerable time, money, and attention elsewhere.

Baker Richards’ Director of Consulting Services, David Reece, makes a similar observation in a recent article for Arts Professional, people are still prepared to spend on experiences even if they’re cutting back elsewhere”.

In this context the threat to cultural organisations is not other cultural organisations (fwiw from my perspective it never has been), but all the other ways that people are choosing to spend their time and attention.

Aubrey Bergauer has long written about how the arts need to change the way they market what they do, with an accompanying need to focus on the audience experience (Aubrey focuses specifically on classical music most of the time but her observations feel pretty applicable across performing arts as a whole).

In a recent article, Aubrey outlined 10 areas that she thinks arts organisations should be focusing on which included the urge to:

  • Center the Customer
  • Focus on Retention over Acquisition
  • Use Digital Content to Drive Analog Attendance
  • Expand the Audience to Look More Like Our Communities
  • Engage in Advocacy
  • Double Down on Pursuing Relevance

All of which are important considerations.

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

But I also believe there is a gap in the conversation around motivation and value.

Why would someone choose to spend their money on any one of the things mentioned above, but not on a trip to the ballet, opera, theatre, or orchestra? What are they getting there that they don’t get from you, or don’t think/feel they will get from you.

And, to speak to Aubrey’s point about retention, why are those people who do decide to try the arts for the first time then rarely, if ever, coming back a second time. How are we failing to motivate that reattendance?

It feels as though, with the sector in an understandable panic against a darkening economic backdrop of inflation, cost of living crises, decreases in funding, and ageing audiences, cultural organisations are perhaps not spending enough time understanding the root cause of the issue before jumping to attempted solutions.

I’ve written about this before:

Which is why it’s exciting to see this new research project from Indigo, “Tomorrow's Audience”. This project will aim to “Deepen[ing] understanding of first-time attenders to help cultural organisations develop the loyal audiences of tomorrow” with a specific focus to “Understand the drivers of reattendance in order to develop meaningful connections with new audiences and ensure they want to keep coming back”.

I’m intrigued to see what they discover.

With a similar sense of curiosity I’m excited that we will be joined at next year’s Digital Works Conference by author, Richard Shotton.

Richard’s book, The Choice Factory is a brilliant explainer of 25 behavioural biases that affect what we buy, and his background in behavioural research means I’m fascinated to hear his perspectives on the psychology of motivation.

You can buy your tickets to the conference now, and I’ll be keeping an eye out for the findings of Indigo’s research project in the coming months.

Share this post